Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs FirePro W4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code namePitcairnVega 10
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date7 August 2012 (13 years ago)19 March 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683072
Core clock speed825 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate39.60249.6
Floating-point processing power1.267 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48192
L1 Cache192 KB768 KB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length183 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz786 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s402.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2012 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Pro Vega 48 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4000 and Radeon Pro Vega 48. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 48 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 79 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4000 or Radeon Pro Vega 48, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.