GeForce GTX 260 216 vs FirePro W4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code namePitcairnGT200
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 August 2012 (13 years ago)16 September 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768216
Core clock speed825 MHz576 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt182 Watt
Texture fill rate39.6041.47
Floating-point processing power1.267 TFLOPS0.5365 TFLOPS
ROPs3228
TMUs4872
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length183 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB896 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2012 16 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 182 Watt

FirePro W4000 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 129% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 132% more advanced lithography process, and 143% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4000 and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 26 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4000 or GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.