Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition vs FirePro W2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking918not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.40no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameOlandVega 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 August 2014 (11 years ago)7 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204096
Core clock speed630 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHz1536 MHz
Number of transistors950 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60393.2
Floating-point processing power0.4352 TFLOPS12.58 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs20256
L1 Cache80 KB1 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data282 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 August 2014 7 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 295 Watt

FirePro W2100 has 1035% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Limited Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W2100 and Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 102 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 20 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W2100 or Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.