Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile vs FirePro W2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking918not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.40no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameOlandBarcelo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 August 2014 (11 years ago)6 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320448
Core clock speed630 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors950 million10,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate13.6050.40
Floating-point processing power0.4352 TFLOPS1.613 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2028
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Width1-slotno data
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 August 2014 6 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 45 Watt

FirePro W2100 has 73% lower power consumption.

Graphics 448SP Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W2100 and Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 102 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 59 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W2100 or Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.