GMA vs FirePro W2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9061588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.32no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameOlandCloverview
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 August 2014 (11 years ago)4 May 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed630 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.601.066
Floating-point processing power0.4352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs202
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W2100 903
+45050%
Samples: 239
GMA 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12no data
4K2no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 6−7 no data
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Fortnite 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7 no data
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Fortnite 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22 no data
Valorant 16−18 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 10−12 no data

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 August 2014 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

FirePro W2100 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W2100 and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation graphics card while GMA is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W2100
FirePro W2100
Intel GMA
GMA

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 99 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W2100 or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.