Radeon R7 A360 vs ATI FirePro V9800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1022
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameCypressMeso
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date9 September 2010 (15 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1600384
Core clock speed850 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1125 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate68.0027.00
Floating-point processing power2.72 TFLOPS0.864 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8024
L1 Cache160 KB96 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.0
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 September 2010 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

ATI V9800P has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

R7 A360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V9800P and Radeon R7 A360. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V9800P is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 A360 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V9800P
FirePro V9800P
AMD Radeon R7 A360
Radeon R7 A360

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 A360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V9800P or Radeon R7 A360, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.