Radeon RX 5950 XT vs ATI FirePro V8800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCypressNavi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 April 2010 (15 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16005120
Core clock speed825 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1635 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)208 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate66.00523.2
Floating-point processing power2.64 TFLOPS16.74 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs80320
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 208 Watt 350 Watt

ATI V8800 has 68.3% lower power consumption.

RX 5950 XT, on the other hand, has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8800 and Radeon RX 5950 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V8800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5950 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V8800
FirePro V8800
AMD Radeon RX 5950 XT
Radeon RX 5950 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 37 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8800 or Radeon RX 5950 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.