GRID M6-8Q vs ATI FirePro V8800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.55
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameCypressGM204
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 April 2010 (15 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16001536
Core clock speed825 MHz722 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)208 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate66.0069.31
Floating-point processing power2.64 TFLOPS2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs8096
L1 Cache160 KB576 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 April 2010 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 208 Watt 100 Watt

GRID M6-8Q has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 108% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8800 and GRID M6-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V8800
FirePro V8800
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
GRID M6-8Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M6-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8800 or GRID M6-8Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.