Radeon R5 A240 vs ATI FirePro V8750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1045
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.12
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRV770Oland
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 July 2008 (17 years ago)2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800320
Core clock speed750 MHz1030 MHz
Boost clock speedno data780 MHz
Number of transistors956 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate30.0015.60
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs4020
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length254 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 50 Watt

R5 A240 has a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 202% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8750 and Radeon R5 A240. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V8750 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 A240 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V8750
FirePro V8750
AMD Radeon R5 A240
Radeon R5 A240

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8750 or Radeon R5 A240, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.