Radeon 620 vs ATI FirePro V8750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated902
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Power efficiencyno data3.50
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRV770Polaris 24
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 July 2008 (17 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800384
Core clock speed750 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors956 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate30.0024.58
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4024
L1 Cache160 KB96 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 July 2008 13 May 2019
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 620 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 202% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8750 and Radeon 620. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V8750 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 620 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V8750
FirePro V8750
AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 68 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8750 or Radeon 620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.