ATI Radeon HD 3850 vs ATI FirePro V8700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiencyno data0.99
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV770RV670
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)19 November 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800320
Core clock speed750 MHz668 MHz
Number of transistors956 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate30.0010.69
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPS0.4275 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4016
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length254 mm208 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz830 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s53.12 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 19 November 2007
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 75 Watt

ATI V8700 has an age advantage of 9 months.

ATI HD 3850, on the other hand, has 101.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8700 and Radeon HD 3850. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V8700 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 3850 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V8700
FirePro V8700
ATI Radeon HD 3850
Radeon HD 3850

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate FirePro V8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 220 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8700 or Radeon HD 3850, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.