Quadro FX 380 vs ATI FirePro V8700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data1.11
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV770G96
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)30 March 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80016
Core clock speed750 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors956 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt34 Watt
Texture fill rate30.003.600
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs408
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length254 mm198 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 30 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 34 Watt

ATI V8700 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.

FX 380, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 344% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8700 and Quadro FX 380. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate FirePro V8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 15 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8700 or Quadro FX 380, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.