Quadro 4000 vs ATI FirePro V8700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated768
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.08
Power efficiencyno data1.91
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRV770GF100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)2 November 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800256
Core clock speed750 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors956 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt142 Watt
Texture fill rate30.0015.20
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPS0.4864 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4032
L1 Cache160 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length254 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz702 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s89.86 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 2 November 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 142 Watt

Quadro 4000 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 6.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8700 and Quadro 4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V8700
FirePro V8700
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Quadro 4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate FirePro V8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 198 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8700 or Quadro 4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.