GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs FirePro V7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking663not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.77no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCaymanGK104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2011 (14 years ago)19 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801152 ×2
Core clock speed725 MHz1006 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1072 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate58.00102.9 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPS2.47 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs3232 ×2
TMUs8096 ×2
L1 Cache320 KB96 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mm279 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s192.3 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2011 19 November 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 250 Watt

FirePro V7900 has 65.6% lower power consumption.

GTX 760 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V7900 and GeForce GTX 760 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V7900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 760 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V7900
FirePro V7900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
GeForce GTX 760 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 18 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 17 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7900 or GeForce GTX 760 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.