Radeon R7 350 640SP vs FirePro V7900 SDI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameCaymanCape Verde
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2011 (14 years ago)7 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280640
Core clock speed725 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)224 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate58.0037.00
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPS1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8040
L1 Cache320 KB160 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x SDI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2011 7 January 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 224 Watt 55 Watt

R7 350 640SP has an age advantage of 7 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 307.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V7900 SDI and Radeon R7 350 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V7900 SDI is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 640SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
FirePro V7900 SDI
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
Radeon R7 350 640SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7900 SDI or Radeon R7 350 640SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.