Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs FirePro V7900 SDI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated280
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.14
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameCaymanGP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date24 May 2011 (14 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speed725 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1404 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)224 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate58.00157.2
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPS5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80112
L1 Cache320 KB672 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length279 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s168.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x SDINo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2011 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 224 Watt 75 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 198.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V7900 SDI and Quadro P3200 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V7900 SDI is a workstation graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
FirePro V7900 SDI
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 25 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7900 SDI or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.