RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V7800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated16
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.04
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCypressAD102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 May 2011 (14 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144012800
Core clock speed700 MHz1155 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2550 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)138 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate50.401,020
Floating-point processing power2.016 TFLOPS65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs32176
TMUs72400
Tensor Coresno data400
Ray Tracing Coresno data100
L1 Cache144 KB12.5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB72 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 May 2011 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 138 Watt 250 Watt

ATI V7800P has 81.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V7800P and RTX 5000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V7800P
FirePro V7800P
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V7800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 95 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7800P or RTX 5000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.