GeForce 9200M vs ATI FirePro V7800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.18
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameCypressC79
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date16 May 2011 (14 years ago)15 October 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144016
Core clock speed700 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)138 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate50.403.600
Floating-point processing power2.016 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs728
L1 Cache144 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 May 2011 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 138 Watt 12 Watt

ATI V7800P has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200M, on the other hand, has 1050% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V7800P and GeForce 9200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V7800P is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9200M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V7800P
FirePro V7800P
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V7800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7800P or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.