ATI FireGL V7300 vs ATI FirePro V7800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameCypressR520
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 April 2010 (15 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$759 $1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1440no data
Core clock speed700 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt97 Watt
Texture fill rate50.409.504
Floating-point processing power2.016 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3216
TMUs7216
L1 Cache144 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length254 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz648 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s41.47 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2010 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 97 Watt

ATI V7800 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7300, on the other hand, has 54.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V7800 and FireGL V7300. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V7800
FirePro V7800
ATI FireGL V7300
FireGL V7300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate FirePro V7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7800 or FireGL V7300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.