Quadro CX vs FirePro V5800

#ad
Buy on Amazon
DVI
VS

Aggregated performance score

ATI V5800
2010
1024 MB GDDR5
3.66
+49.4%

FirePro V5800 outperforms Quadro CX by 49% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking672797
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.370.13
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameJuniperGT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 April 2010 (14 years ago)11 November 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 $1,999
Current price$354 (0.7x MSRP)$17.66 (0x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI V5800 has 185% better value for money than Quadro CX.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800192
Core clock speed690 MHz602 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate27.6038.53
Floating-point performance1,104.0 gflops462.3 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDAno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI V5800 3.66
+49.4%
Quadro CX 2.45

FirePro V5800 outperforms Quadro CX by 49% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI V5800 1415
+49.4%
Quadro CX 947

FirePro V5800 outperforms Quadro CX by 49% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 3.66 2.45
Recency 26 April 2010 11 November 2008
Cost $479 $1999
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 150 Watt

The FirePro V5800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro CX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V5800
FirePro V5800
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Quadro CX

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 90 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro CX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.