Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded vs ATI FirePro V5800 DVI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameJuniperRaven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date26 April 2010 (15 years ago)19 April 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$529 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800704
Core clock speed690 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1251 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate27.6055.04
Floating-point processing power1.104 TFLOPS1.761 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4044
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2010 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 111.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V5800 DVI and Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V5800 DVI is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V5800 DVI
FirePro V5800 DVI
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 DVI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V5800 DVI or Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.