Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs FirePro V4900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking893not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.46no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTurksTU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 November 2011 (14 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4804608
Core clock speed800 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors716 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20466.6
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS14.93 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs24288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cache48 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length163 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s624.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 260 Watt

FirePro V4900 has 247% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V4900 and Quadro RTX 6000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 156 votes

Rate FirePro V4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V4900 or Quadro RTX 6000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.