GeForce3 Ti500 vs FirePro V4900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking865not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.46no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameTurksNV20 A5
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed800 MHz240 MHz
Number of transistors716 million57 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate19.201.920
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length163 mm183 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 1 October 2001
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

FirePro V4900 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V4900 and GeForce3 Ti500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V4900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce3 Ti500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4900
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500
GeForce3 Ti500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 155 votes

Rate FirePro V4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 29 votes

Rate GeForce3 Ti500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V4900 or GeForce3 Ti500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.