Radeon R7 A260 vs ATI FirePro V4800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRedwoodTopaz
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date26 April 2010 (15 years ago)2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400384
Core clock speed775 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data980 MHz
Number of transistors627 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)69 Wattno data
Texture fill rate15.5023.52
Floating-point processing power0.62 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs2024
L1 Cache40 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz3.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

R7 A260 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V4800 and Radeon R7 A260. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V4800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 A260 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V4800
FirePro V4800
AMD Radeon R7 A260
Radeon R7 A260

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 63 votes

Rate FirePro V4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 A260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V4800 or Radeon R7 A260, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.