GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs FirePro V3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking991not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.32no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTurksGT200B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2012 (13 years ago)16 February 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480240
Core clock speed650 MHz633 MHz
Number of transistors716 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)199 Watt219 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6050.64
Floating-point processing power0.624 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs828
TMUs2480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorhalf height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB896 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth28 GB/s127.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2012 16 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 199 Watt 219 Watt

FirePro V3900 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 10.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3900 and GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 97 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3900 or GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.