Radeon 660M vs ATI FirePro V3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated570
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.80
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRedwoodRembrandt+
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date26 April 2010 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400384
Core clock speed650 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors627 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate13.0045.60
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2024
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L0 Cacheno data96 KB
L1 Cache40 KB128 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2010 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 40 Watt

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 12 years, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 7.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3800 and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V3800
FirePro V3800
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 53 votes

Rate FirePro V3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 466 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3800 or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.