Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRV730Cape Verde
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)21 December 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320512
Core clock speed550 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data930 MHz
Number of transistors514 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6029.76
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3232
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s73.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 21 December 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 65 Watt

ATI V3750 has 35.4% lower power consumption.

R9 255 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3750 and Radeon R9 255 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3750 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V3750
FirePro V3750
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Radeon R9 255 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 9 votes

Rate FirePro V3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1069 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3750 or Radeon R9 255 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.