Radeon HD 7520G vs ATI FirePro V3750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.65
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameRV730Scrapper
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320192
Core clock speed550 MHz496 MHz
Boost clock speedno data685 MHz
Number of transistors514 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate17.608.220
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.263 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs3212
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 55 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 35 Watt

HD 7520G has an age advantage of 3 years, a 71.9% more advanced lithography process, and 37.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3750 and Radeon HD 7520G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3750 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7520G is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V3750
FirePro V3750
AMD Radeon HD 7520G
Radeon HD 7520G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 9 votes

Rate FirePro V3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 108 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7520G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3750 or Radeon HD 7520G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.