ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT vs ATI FirePro V3750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Power efficiencyno data1.13
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV730RV630
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 September 2008 (16 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320120
Core clock speed550 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors514 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate17.606.400
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 45 Watt

ATI V3750 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 2600 XT, on the other hand, has 6.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3750 and Radeon HD 2600 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3750 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 2600 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V3750
FirePro V3750
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Radeon HD 2600 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 9 votes

Rate FirePro V3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 96 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3750 or Radeon HD 2600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.