GeForce GTX 260M vs ATI FirePro V3750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.08
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV730G92
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)3 March 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320112
Core clock speed550 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors514 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6030.80
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.308 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data462
ROPs816
TMUs3256
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-2-way
MXM Typeno dataMXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHzUp to 950 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s61 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortDisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 3 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 65 Watt

ATI V3750 has a 18% more advanced lithography process, and 35% lower power consumption.

GTX 260M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3750 and GeForce GTX 260M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3750 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 260M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 9 votes

Rate FirePro V3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3750 or GeForce GTX 260M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.