GeForce 210 vs ATI FirePro V3750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1362
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.82
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRV730GT218S
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $29.49

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016
Core clock speed550 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistors514 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt30.5 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate17.604.160
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm168 mm
Heightno data2.731" (6.9 cm)
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s8.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortDVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 30 Watt

GeForce 210 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3750 and GeForce 210. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3750 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 210 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V3750
FirePro V3750
NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 9 votes

Rate FirePro V3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 4000 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3750 or GeForce 210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.