RTX A2000 Max-Q vs FirePro S9300 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCapsaicinGA107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date31 March 2016 (10 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×22560
Core clock speed850 MHz682 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1207 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate217.6 ×296.56
Floating-point processing power6.963 TFLOPS ×26.18 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×248
TMUs256 ×280
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache1 MB2.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×24 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s ×2176.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2016 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 95 Watt

RTX A2000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 5 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 216% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9300 X2 and RTX A2000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation graphics card while RTX A2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9300 X2 or RTX A2000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.