Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 vs FirePro S9300 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)no data
GPU code nameCapsaicinno data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date31 March 2016 (9 years ago)29 September 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×2no data
Core clock speed850 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate217.6 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power6.963 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs64 ×2no data
TMUs256 ×2no data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBMno data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s ×2no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)no data
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2016 29 September 2025

Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 has an age advantage of 9 years.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9300 X2 and Qualcomm Adreno X2-85. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2
Qualcomm Adreno X2-85
Adreno X2-85

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9300 X2 or Qualcomm Adreno X2-85, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.