Quadro T1000 vs FirePro S9300 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated376
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.82
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCapsaicinTU117
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date31 March 2016 (9 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×2no data
Core clock speed850 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate217.6 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power6.963 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs64 ×2no data
TMUs256 ×2no data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBMno data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed500 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s ×2no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2016 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro T1000 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9300 X2 and Quadro T1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 540 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9300 X2 or Quadro T1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.