GeForce 210 PCI vs FirePro S9300 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCapsaicinGT216
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 March 2016 (10 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×216
Core clock speed850 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate217.6 ×23.800
Floating-point processing power6.963 TFLOPS ×20.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×24
TMUs256 ×28
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache2 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBMDDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s ×26.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.04.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2016 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 31 Watt

S9300 X2 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

210 PCI, on the other hand, has 868% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9300 X2 and GeForce 210 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 210 PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 85 votes

Rate GeForce 210 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9300 X2 or GeForce 210 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.