UHD Graphics 730 vs FirePro S9170

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated685
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameHawaiiRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 July 2015 (9 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816192
Core clock speed930 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate163.718.60
Floating-point processing power5.238 gflopsno data
ROPs646
TMUs17612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 July 2015 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 1733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9170 and UHD Graphics 730. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9170 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9170
FirePro S9170
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate FirePro S9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1201 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.