Radeon RX 7800 XT vs FirePro S9150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated46
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data68.94
Power efficiencyno data17.03
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameHawaiiNavi 32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 August 2014 (11 years ago)25 August 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28163840
Core clock speed900 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate158.4583.2
Floating-point processing power5.069 TFLOPS37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs176240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L0 Cacheno data960 KB
L1 Cache704 KB768 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2014 25 August 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 263 Watt

FirePro S9150 has 12% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9150 and Radeon RX 7800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9150 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 13 votes

Rate FirePro S9150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5162 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9150 or Radeon RX 7800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.