Radeon R5 A240 vs FirePro S9150
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1047 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.12 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | Hawaii | Oland |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 August 2014 (11 years ago) | 2014 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2816 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 780 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 6,200 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 235 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 158.4 | 15.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.069 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 64 | 8 |
| TMUs | 176 | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Form factor | full height / full length | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1800 MBps |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.5 (5.1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 (1.2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.170 |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 235 Watt | 50 Watt |
FirePro S9150 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.
R5 A240, on the other hand, has 370% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FirePro S9150 and Radeon R5 A240. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that FirePro S9150 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 A240 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
