GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q vs FirePro S9150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameHawaiiGA107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 August 2014 (11 years ago)11 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28162048
Core clock speed900 MHz712 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1057 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate158.467.65
Floating-point processing power5.069 TFLOPS4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs17664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache704 KB2 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2014 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 35 Watt

FirePro S9150 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 571.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9150 and GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9150 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9150
FirePro S9150
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 13 votes

Rate FirePro S9150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 123 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9150 or GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.