Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs FirePro S9010

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.81
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiVega 10
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date24 August 2012 (13 years ago)19 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Core clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1468 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate89.60375.8
Floating-point processing power2.867 TFLOPS12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs112256
L1 Cache448 KB1 MB
L2 Cache768 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 August 2012 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 250 Watt

FirePro S9010 has 25% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9010 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9010 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9010
FirePro S9010
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate FirePro S9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 38 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9010 or Radeon Pro Vega 64X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.