Radeon 760M vs FirePro S9010

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data66.27
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameTahitiPhoenix
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 August 2012 (13 years ago)31 January 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792512
Core clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2599 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate89.6083.17
Floating-point processing power2.867 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs11232
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L0 Cacheno data128 KB
L1 Cache448 KB128 KB
L2 Cache768 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 August 2012 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 760M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 1233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9010 and Radeon 760M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9010 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate FirePro S9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 514 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9010 or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.