Radeon Instinct MI355X vs FirePro S7150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking520not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Power efficiency4.61no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)CDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTongaCDNA Next
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 February 2016 (9 years ago)2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816384
Core clock speed920 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million185,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt1400 Watt
Texture fill rate117.82,457.6
Floating-point processing power3.768 TFLOPS78.64 TFLOPS
ROPs32no data
TMUs1281024
Tensor Coresno data1024
L1 Cache512 KB4 MB
L2 Cache512 KB16 MB
L3 Cacheno data256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB288 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s8.19 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.3N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 288 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 1400 Watt

FirePro S7150 has 833.3% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI355X, on the other hand, has a 3500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S7150 and Radeon Instinct MI355X. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S7150
FirePro S7150
AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X
Radeon Instinct MI355X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 9 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Instinct MI355X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S7150 or Radeon Instinct MI355X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.