H200 SXM 141 GB vs FirePro S7150

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking458not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.61no data
Power efficiency4.53no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTongaGH100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 February 2016 (8 years ago)18 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816896
Core clock speed920 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1980 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate117.81,045
Floating-point processing power3.768 TFLOPS66.91 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs128528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB141 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s3.36 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.3N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2016 18 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 141 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 700 Watt

FirePro S7150 has 366.7% lower power consumption.

H200 SXM 141 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1662.5% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S7150 and H200 SXM 141 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S7150
FirePro S7150
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
H200 SXM 141 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 9 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate H200 SXM 141 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.