GRID A100A vs FirePro S7150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking524not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Power efficiency4.62no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTongaGA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 February 2016 (10 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486912
Core clock speed920 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1005 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate117.8434.2
Floating-point processing power3.768 TFLOPS13.89 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs128432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache512 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit6144 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s1,866 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2016 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 400 Watt

FirePro S7150 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

GRID A100A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S7150 and GRID A100A. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S7150
FirePro S7150
NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 9 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S7150 or GRID A100A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.