Radeon Pro W6600 vs FirePro S7100X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.73
Power efficiencyno data27.49
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameAmethystNavi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date25 May 2016 (9 years ago)8 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481792
Core clock speed725 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2903 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate92.80325.1
Floating-point processing power2.97 TFLOPS10.4 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 May 2016 8 June 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

Pro W6600 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S7100X and Radeon Pro W6600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S7100X is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S7100X
FirePro S7100X
AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Radeon Pro W6600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 8 votes

Rate FirePro S7100X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 96 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S7100X or Radeon Pro W6600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.