Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs FirePro S10000 Passive

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated27
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data28.35
Power efficiencyno data16.95
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTahitiNavi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 $1,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584 ×24096
Core clock speed825 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate106.4 ×2747.5
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×247.84 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×2128
TMUs112 ×2256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length305 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×232 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×2644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2012 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 300 Watt

AI PRO R9700 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 433% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S10000 Passive and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 34 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 Passive or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.