Apple M4 8-core GPU vs FirePro S10000 Passive

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)no data
GPU code nameTahitino data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 November 2012 (12 years ago)28 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584 ×28
Core clock speed825 MHzno data
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate106.4 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×2no data
TMUs112 ×2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5X-7500
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPortno data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2012 28 October 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 4 Watt

Apple M4 8-core GPU has an age advantage of 11 years, a 833.3% more advanced lithography process, and 18650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S10000 Passive and M4 8-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 Passive is a workstation graphics card while Apple M4 8-core GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
FirePro S10000 Passive
Apple M4 8-core GPU
M4 8-core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 31 votes

Rate M4 8-core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 Passive or M4 8-core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.