GMA X4500 vs FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameTahitiEaglelake
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2014 (11 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792 ×280
Core clock speed825 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate106.4 ×22.132
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×24
TMUs112 ×24
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.0
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2014 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 13 Watt

S10000 Passive 12GB has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500, on the other hand, has 2784.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and GMA X4500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB is a workstation graphics card while GMA X4500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
Intel GMA X4500
GMA X4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 21 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 360 votes

Rate GMA X4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB or GMA X4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.