Radeon 625 vs FirePro M8900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated868
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.96
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameBlackcombPolaris 24
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2011 (14 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960384
Core clock speed680 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate32.6424.58
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4824
L1 Cache192 KB96 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 13 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 625 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and Radeon 625. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 625 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M8900
FirePro M8900
AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 164 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M8900 or Radeon 625, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.