RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs FirePro M8900

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data54.68
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBlackcombAD107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2011 (14 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9603072
Core clock speed680 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2115 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate32.64203.0
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS12.99 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs4896
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cache192 KB3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M8900
FirePro M8900
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 42 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M8900 or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.